|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
English-Nederlands-Espaņol-Deutsch
Can vegetarianism help reduce
terrorism? |
|
| |
| The terrorist
attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon are
horrific acts of dehumanization and failure to recognize
the sanctity of human lives, and visible symbols of an
increasingly irrational world. There is never any justification
for acts of terror against innocent civilians. We join
all people of goodwill in expressing our shock, outrage
and sadness at these unspeakable acts of terror, and our
hearts, condolences, and prayers go out to all those affected.
These barbaric acts changed the world in countless
ways. Steps must of course be taken quickly to defend
against additional terrorism and to punish those who
plan and carry out these crimes against humanity. |
|
by
Richard Schwartz, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus,
Mathematics
College of Staten Island
2800 Victory Boulevard
Staten Island, NY 10314 USA (718) 982-3621
Email address: Schwartz@postbox.csi.cuny.edu
|
| |
|
|
| In
this context, it might be thought that other considerations,
such as dietary choices, are inappropriate and even
offensive. However, it is essential that these senseless
acts of terrorism not further impede the
already fragile global efforts to cooperate in addressing
the world's pressing social, economic, and environmental
threats. Perhaps we can look beyond the horror and productively
utilize our current feelings of vulnerability and sadness.
Although seldom discussed, animal-based diets and
agriculture constitute what Jeremy Rifkin called "cold
evil," a form of indirect, unconscious terrorism,
which may also make future terrorism more likely. For
a safer, more stable and sustainable world, it is essential
that, along with other steps to defend against evil
and irrational acts of terror, the effects of the mass
production and widespread consumption of animal products
be considered. |
|
In 1992, over 1,670 scientists, including 104 Nobel
laureates -- a majority of the living recipients of
the Prizes in the sciences -- signed a "World Scientists'
Warning To Humanity." Their introduction states:
Human beings and the natural world are on a collision
course. Human activities inflict harsh and often irreversible
damage on the environment and on critical resources.
If not checked, many of our current practices put at
serious risk the future that we wish for human society
and the plant and animal kingdoms, and may so alter
the living world that it will be unable to sustain life
in the manner that we know.
Fundamental changes are urgent if we are to avoid the
collision our present course will bring about.
The scientists' analysis discussed threats to the
atmosphere, rivers and streams, oceans, soil, living
species, and forests. Their warning: We the undersigned,
senior members of the world's scientific community,
hereby warn all humanity of what lies ahead. A great
change in our stewardship of the earth and the life
on it is required, if vast human misery is to be avoided
and our global home on this planet is not to be irretrievably
mutilated. |
| |
|
|
| Many
of the problems that the scientists are warning about,
including hunger, water shortages, demand for sufficient
energy, desertification, global climate change, and
a culture of violence, are already having major negative
effects and also have the potential of resulting in
future acts of terrorism. Fortunately, these problems
can be substantially alleviated through a shift to plant-based
diets:
*The magnitude of world hunger is staggering: More than
a billion people, over one out of 6 people in the world,
are chronically hungry or suffer from malnutrition.
Children are particularly victimized by malnutrition.
Throughout the world, over 12 million children under
the age of 5 die every year -about 34,000 each day --
from diseases brought on or complicated by malnutrition.
Each year, almost 8 million children die before their
first birthday, largely due to malnutrition. Malnourishment
also causes listlessness and reduced capacity for learning
and work, thus perpetuating the legacy of poverty. |
|
Numerous factors, including rapidly increasing world
population and affluence, environmental strains, climate
changes, and significant decreases in clean water, arable
land, fish catches, and land productivity all threaten
the world's food security. Providing enough food for
the world's rapidly increasing population will be a
critical issue for many decades.
Extensive hunger and malnutrition in so many parts
of the world make rebellion and violence more likely.
Professor Georg Borgstrom, international expert on food
science, fears that "the rich world is on a direct
collision course with the poor of the world... We cannot
survive behind our Maginot line of missiles and bombs.
Unless the problem of global hunger is fully addressed
soon, the outlook for global stability is very poor.
|
| |
|
|
Can
a shift to vegetarian diets make a difference with regard
to world hunger?
Consider these statistics: It takes about 16 pounds of
grain to produce one pound of edible beef from animals
raised in feedlots. Over 70 percent of the grain produced
in the United States and over one-third of the world's
grain production is fed to animals destined for slaughter.
If Americans reduced their beef consumption by 10 percent,
it would free up enough grain to feed all of the world's
people who annually die of hunger and related diseases.
According to the Council for Agricultural Science and
Technology, an Iowa-based non-profit research group, the
grain fed to animals to produce meat, milk, and eggs could
feed five times the number of people that it presently
does if it were consumed directly by humans.
Land that grows potatoes, rice and other vegetables
can support about 20 times as many people as land that
produces grain-fed beef. Feeding grain to livestock
wastes 90% of the protein, almost 100% of the carbohydrates,
and 100% of the fiber of the grain. While grains are
a rich source of fiber, animal products have no fiber
at all. This evidence indicates that the food being
fed to animals in the affluent nations could, if properly
distributed, end both hunger and malnutrition throughout
the world. |
|
Unfortunately, the world is moving increasingly to animal-based
diets as people in nations that have been becoming more
affluent, such as China, India, and Japan, move up the
food chain. Because of a shift toward meat from grain-fed
animals, China shifted in 1995 from a grain exporter
to a major grain importer. If this trend continues,
it will have very serious implications for future food
security.
* Due to heavy demand for water, there are serious
shortages in about 80 countries (including Israel) which
contain 40 percent of the world's population. According
to a report released recently by Population Action International,
over the next 25 years, the number of people facing
chronic or severe water shortages could increase from
505 million to more than 3 billion. The report said
water shortages would be worst in the Middle East and
much of Africa. Globally, 2 billion people live in areas
with chronic water shortages. A combination of population
growth, drought, desertification, waste of water, and
global warming is causing a serious water shortage in
China that experts say could induce environmental and
political crises. Officials are blaming drought for
a 9.3 percent drop in the summer grain yield, and water
rationing has been imposed on residents and industries
in nearly 100 cities. |
| |
|
|
| Pollution of lakes,
rivers, and groundwater further limits supplies of usable
water. In the past few decades, industrialization, population
growth, and the heavy use of chemical fertilizers have
doubled the amount of nitrogen in circulation, contributing
to environmental problems worldwide and possibly to human
health problems like cancer and memory failure. Hardest
hit are coastal bays and oceans -- deadly algae blooms
are cropping up from Finnish beaches to Hong Kong harbors,
massive unexpected fish kills are occurring from Maryland's
Chesapeake Bay to Russia's Black Sea, and coral reefs
are in decline around the globe. |
|
Once
again, a shift toward vegetarianism can make a significant
difference. The standard diet of a meat-eater in the
United States requires 4,200 gallons of water per day
(for animals' drinking water, irrigation of crops, meat
processing, washing, cooking, etc.) A person on a purely
vegetarian (vegan) diet requires only 300 gallons per
day. Animal agriculture is the major consumer of water
in the U.S. According to Norman Myers, author of Gaia:
An Atlas of Planet Management, irrigation, primarily
to grow crops for animals, uses over 80 percent of U.S.
water. The production of only one pound of edible beef
in a semi-arid area such as California requires as much
as 5,200 gallons of water, as contrasted with only 25
gallons or less to produce an edible pound of tomatoes,
lettuce, potatoes, or wheat. Newsweek reported in 1988
that "the water that goes into a 1,000 pound steer
would float a (Naval) destroyer." |
| |
|
|
| Mountains
of manure produced by cattle raised in feedlots wash
into and pollute streams, rivers, and underground water
sources. U.S. livestock produce an astounding 1.4 billion
tons of manure per year (this amount works out to almost
90,000 pounds per second!), or about 130 times the amount
excreted by the U.S. human population Food geographer,
Georg Borgstrom has estimated that American livestock
contribute five times more organic waste to the pollution
of our water than do people, and twice as much as does
industry.
* About 70 percent of the world's 13.5 billion acres
of agricultural dry lands -- almost 30 percent of the
Earth's total land area -- is at risk of becoming desert.
Over a billion people in 135 countries depend on this
land for food. Loss of agricultural land as well as
the destruction of other ecosystems cause an increase
of migration into cities, where increasingly crowded
conditions lead to disease, hunger, and other negative
effects of poverty, including greater potential for
crime and violence. |
|
As
in every other threat considered in this article, there
is a dietary connection. Grazing animals have destroyed
large areas of land throughout the world, with overgrazing
having long been a prime cause of erosion. Over 60 percent
of all U.S. rangelands are overgrazed, with billions
of tons of soil lost each year. Cattle production is
a prime contributor to every one of the causes of desertification:
overgrazing of livestock, over-cultivation of land,
improper irrigation techniques, deforestation, and prevention
of reforestation. According to mathematician Robin Hur,
nearly 6 billion of the 7 billion tons of eroded soil
in the United States has been lost because of cattle
and feed lot production.
* At current rates of destruction, the world's remaining
rain forests will virtually disappear by about 2031.
According to a study published in the journal Science,
as little as 5 percent of the Amazon rainforest in Brazil
may remain as pristine forest by 2020. Researchers fear
that roads, new homes, logging, and oil exploration
will devastate the 1.3 million-square-mile Amazon forest,
which makes up 40 percent of the Earth's remaining tropical
rainforest. |
| |
|
|
Animal-based
diets and agriculture again plays a major role in rainforest
destruction. Largely to turn beef into fast-food hamburgers
for export to the U.S., the earth's tropical rain forests
are being bulldozed at a rate of a football field per
second. Each imported quarter-pound fast-food hamburger
patty requires the destruction of 55 square feet of tropical
forest for grazing. Half of the rainforests are already
gone forever and at current rates of destruction the rest
will be gone by the middle of the next century.
What makes this especially ominous is that half of the
world's fast disappearing species of plants and animals
reside in tropical rain forests. We are risking the loss
of species which might hold secrets for cures of dead
ly diseases. Other plant species might turn out to be
good sources of nutrition. Also, the destruction of rain
forests is altering the climate and reducing rainfall,
with potentially devastating effects on the world's agriculture
and habitability. |
|
*
Global climate change may be the most critical problem
the world will face in the next few decades. There is
a growing scientific consensus that we are already experiencing
the effects of global warming, and that human actions
are playing a significant role. Global average temperatures
have increased about one degree Fahrenheit since 1900.
This doesn't sound like much, but it is causing major
changes in our weather patterns. The warmest decade in
recorded history was the 1990s. The ten warmest years
on record have all occurred since 1983, with seven of
them since 1990. The global temperature In 1998 was the
warmest in recorded history.
|
| |
|
|
| In
the year 2000, in its Third Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a U.N.-sponsored organization
composed of leading climate scientists from over 100 nations,
made two momentous revisions in its previous forecasts
of global warming. It estimated that by 2100, the average
world temperature could rise between 2.5 and 10.4 degrees
Fahrenheit, a range significantly higher than the 1.8
to 6.3 degree rise predicted by the IPCC in 1995. Also,
the group became far more emphatic that it is human activities,
rather than natural planetary cycles, that are "contributing
substantially" to the increase, and they indicated
that they expect these human contributions will continue
to grow. The IPCC report, which runs to over 1,000 pages,
was written by 123 lead authors from many countries who
drew on 516 contributing experts and is one of the most
comprehensive produced on global warming. Hence, the conclusions
of the report represent an unprecedented consensus among
hundreds of climate scientists from all over the world.
This makes their summary statement that "Projected
climate changes during the 21st century have the potential
to lead to future large-scale and possible irreversible
changes in Earth systems,'' with "continental and
global consequences'' especially ominous. |
|
While
recent increased concern about global warming is very
welcome, the many connections between typical American
(and other Western) diets and global warming have generally
been overlooked. Current modern intensive livestock agriculture
and the consumption of meat contribute greatly to the
four major gases associated with the greenhouse effect:
carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxides, and chlorofluorocarbons.
The burning of tropical forests releases tons of carbon
dioxide into the atmosphere and eliminates the ability
of these trees to absorb carbon dioxide. Also, the highly
mechanized agricultural sector uses an enormous amount
of fossil fuel to produce pesticides, chemical fertilizer,
and other agricultural resources, and this also contributes
to carbon dioxide emissions. Cattle emit methane as
part of their digestive process, as do termites who
feast on the charred remains of trees that were burned
to create grazing land and land to grow feed crops for
farmed animals. The large amounts of petrochemical fertilizers
used to produce feed crops create significant quantities
of nitrous oxides. Likewise, the increased refrigeration
necessary to prevent animal products from spoiling adds
chlorofluorocarbons to the atmosphere. |
| |
|
|
| In
2001 a series of brownouts (rolling blackouts) in California
and rapidly rising gasoline prices thrust the energy issue
back into the foreground. Announcing the recommendations
of his energy task force headed by Vice President Dick
Cheney, President George W. Bush argued that if America
failed to act now, "this great country could face
a darker future, a future that is, unfortunately, being
previewed in rising prices at the gas pump and rolling
blackouts in the great state of California." Bush
stated that ''America needs an energy plan that faces
up to our energy challenges and meets them.'' The White
House task force's report cited a ''fundamental imbalance
between supply and demand'' and depicted the potential
for a very gloomy energy picture, including high gasoline
and electricity prices across much of the country, soaring
natural gas prices causing havoc with farmers and the
possibility of power blackouts in the West and Northeast.
Responses to the Bush task force energy recommendations
were predictable, with Republicans and oil, gas, and nuclear
interests strongly supporting it, and Democrats and environmentalists
loudly opposing it. |
|
Whatever
methods are used to produce energy, a shift to plant-based
diets can sharply reduce demand for energy. In the United
States, an average of 10 calories of fuel energy is required
for every calorie of food energy produced; many other
countries obtain 20 or more calories of food energy per
calorie of fuel energy. To produce one pound of steak
(500 calories of food energy) requires 20,000 calories
of fossil fuels, most of which is expended in producing
and providing feed crops. It requires 78 calories of fossil
fuel for each calorie of protein obtained from feedlot-produced
beef, but only 2 calories of fossil fuel to produce a
calorie of protein from soybeans. Grains and beans require
only two to five percent as much fossil fuel as beef.
The energy needed to produce a pound of grain-fed beef
is equivalent to one gallon of gasoline. |
| |
|
|
| *
Animal-based diets and agriculture also have implications
re the possibility of the spread of anthrax and other
deadly bacteria, as well as our ability to resist these
bacteria through antibiotics. The October 2001 issue of
the New England Journal of Medicine reported that three
independent studies found that up to half of supermarket
meat and poultry samples were contaminated with antibiotic-resistant
bacteria that each year kill thousands and sicken millions.
All this is in spite of the implementation of the new,
highly touted USDA meat inspection program and without
the workings of anyone wishing us ill.
Now, consider the opportunity that a slaughterhouse
provides to a bio-terrorist. US slaughterhouses have
a very large turnover of undocumented aliens. It would
be relatively easy for a bio-terrorist to enter the
country legally or otherwise, join the slaughterhouse
staff, and slip a powerful pathogen into a vat of ground
meat destined for hamburgers or hot dogs (frequently
eaten uncooked). The culprit would be long out of the
country before the contaminated product reaches supermarket
shelves and thousands of his victims begin dying. Anyone
really concerned with anthrax or other form of bio-terrorism
would be well advised to lay off meat and poultry for
a while. |
|
There
are also threats to our ability to respond to diseases
because of the decreasing effectiveness of antibiotics.
Over half the antibiotics produced in the United States
are routinely fed to animals in their feed. It would be
impossible to maintain healthy animals under the cramped
conditions of "factory farming" without these
drugs. Further, for reasons which are not fully understood,
the antibiotics also seem to act as "growth promoters"
leading to heavier animals and thus more weight for the
market, providing even greater incentive to administer
drugs.
Unfortunately, this practice places enormous "selective
pressure" on the bacteria which inhabit these animals
to develop resistance to the antibiotics in the feed.
Genes which neutralize the effects of antibiotics arise
as a result of this selective pressure (i.e., in the presence
of antibiotics, only those organisms which have the capability
of neutralizing the antibiotics will survive). These resistant
genes are easily transferred from one bacterium to another,
and they may protect germs which cause human disease from
antibiotic treatment. |
| |
|
|
| There
has already been a tremendous increase in antibiotic resistance
in common food poisoning bacteria like salmonella,45 but
the problem is even worse than simply the antibiotic-resistant
bacteria in the food animals themselves. Bacteria also
have the capability of rapidly transferring and spreading
the antibiotic-resistant character to other bacterial
species, including those which cause other diseases. Therefore,
diseases which are not even related to food consumption
may become resistant to antibiotics, and hence a much
greater threat. For example, staphylococcus bacteria have
been isolated in recent years which are resistant to every
known commercially available antibiotic. If this organism
gets into one's blood stream, the person will very likely
die.
As a result, there is a scientific consensus that
the extensive use of antibiotics to produce meat and
other animal products, along with their over-use in
medicine, has increased resistance among bacteria and
jeopardized human health by causing diseases that are
difficult or impossible to cure. For example, in 1997,
the World Health Organization called for a ban on the
routine use of antibiotics in livestock feed. In 1998,
the journal Science called the meat industry "the
driving force behind the development of antibiotic resistance
in certain species of bacteria that cause human disease,"
and later that year, the Center for Disease Control
blamed the use of antibiotics in livestock feed for
the emergence of salmonella bacteria resistant to five
different antibiotics. Joshua Lederberg, M.D., a Nobel
Laureate, stated "we're running out of bullets
for dealing with a number of these infections. Patients
are dying because we no longer in many cases have antibiotics
that work." |
|
The
widespread use of antibiotics in animal feed is thus a
global threat to human health for every individual on
earth. People need prescriptions for these drugs, yet
the animal industry uses them casually. This irresponsible
misuse of antibiotics is unilaterally disarming our species
from a last line of defense, and devastating epidemics
may well be the legacy of the hunger for inexpensive meat.
* Another benefit of a shift toward plant-based diets
is a reduction in the current widespread violence in
the world. Presently 10 billion animals in the US alone
and 45 billion animals worldwide are cruelly treated
on "factory farms" and then slaughtered for
consumption. Many practices are particularly shocking:
the force-feeding of huge amounts of grains to ducks
and geese to produce pate de foie gras; the raising
of veal calves who are taken away from their mothers
almost immediately after birth, and are kept in narrow
pens, where they are denied exercise, and fed a diet
deficient in iron and other essential nutrients; the
killing of over 250 million male chicks immediately
after birth because they can't lay eggs and have not
been genetically programmed to produce much meat. There
are documented studies that violence towards animals
by children is a strong predictor of violent and criminal
behavior in theadults those children grow up to be. |
| |
|
|
| In view of these
many negative effects of animal-based agriculture, it
is scandalous that U.S. meat conglomerates, aided by the
World bank and other international financial institutions,
are promoting food policies and trade agreements that
would double world production and consumption of meat
and other animal food products in the next 20 years. Most
of this expansion would take place in less developed nations,
through massive factory farming operations similar to
these currently being used in the developed world. This
would have very severe consequences for the poor countries
and worldwide: more hunger, more poverty, more pollution,
more animal suffering, less self- determination for the
people in low-income nations, and less water for everyone. |
|
When
we consider all of the negative effects of animal-based
diets, it is clear that animal-centered diets and the
livestock agriculture needed to sustain them pose tremendous
threats to global survival and increase the potential
for future terrorism. (The direct negative effects on
human health of high fat, high cholesterol, low fiber
animal-based diets should also be considered,) It is not
surprising that the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS)
ranks the consumption of meat and poultry as the second
most harmful (to the environment) consumer activity (surpassed
only by the use of cars and light trucks). It is clear
that a shift toward vegetarianism is imperative to move
our precious but imperiled planet away from its present
catastrophic path and to reduce the potential for future
terrorism. |
| |
|
|
| Buy books from Richard Schwartz
at Amazon: |
|
|
| |
UK: |
|
USA: |
Canada: |
| |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| Want to know more? We sell books on animal rights, animal welfare, nature and wildlife, factory farming, food politics, the meat industry, antibiotic resistant bacteria, ecological footprint, harmful myths; we offer cruelty free products, DVD's about animals, vegan food, vegan and vegetarian books, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|