Please wait whilst your request is being processed...

Recommended screen resolution of at least 1024 wide by 768 high.

Links on this site have this color. Menu, choices at the left and above.
Commercial links are underlined (double).
 
 
 
 
 
Homepage
 
Information
 
Opinion
 
Reaction
 
Search
 
Internetshop
 

Google:

Internet
Animal Freedom

 

 
Our standpoint on animals rights General opinion on animals Factory farming is wrong Keeping pets More opinion  
 


English-Nederlands-Espaņol-Deutsch

Is it wrong to withhold freedom from animals?

 

As humans we can imagine what is wrong about withholding freedom from other people. When a child is born, birth is the first step on the way to freedom. His upbringing will hopefully prepare him to function freely as an adult later in life. Freedom is a means and an end to a meaningful life. But every individual has to determine for himself what is meaningful.
Animals in factory farming are born to be eaten when they are barely mature, or to produce food for a certain period of time.
In cases where animals are kept to be eaten, the time they are kept will be as short as possible. A longer life is economically not feasible. The most familiar and most widespread examples are meat pigs and chicks. These animals are given the least opportunity to behave naturally, and are only fed in a way that they will grow as quickly as possible. Their short lives consist of boredom because they are waiting mainly in the dark to keep them calm (low energy). Eating and sleeping are almost their only activities. At the moment of slaughter, they are unprepared to anything unusual and so it is a stressful event. More so if they are transported over long distances to the slaughterhouse. In the first stage of their lives they feel too little and in the final stages they feel too much.

 

Is this wrong: having an animal grow up disabled, so to speak, for meat consumption? Is condemning them to boredom reprehensible towards the animals and harmful to their well-being? Is it a form of abuse when you do not optimize their welfare? Is an animal's life meaningful when it only lives to be eaten and not for itself?

Is there an answer that can convince a person who is indifferent to the rights of an animal?

When we see other people suffer, we can try to place ourselves in that other person's shoes and try to imagine how this would feel. Most of us will then try to help this other person and to relieve their suffering.
Man has only recently invented the situation of withholding every sort of freedom from animals even before they are eaten. Before that time, the animals could at least enjoy their freedom before they were eaten.
We can now help animals in factory farming by freeing ourselves: by not eating meat from factory farming and by making it impossible to make money on the exploitation and exportation of animals. This alone does not make life more meaningful, but at least there is less pointlessness and suffering.

     
Amazon UK:   Amazon USA:
Animal Welfare: A Cool Eye Towards Eden by John Webster  
     
Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare (Third Edition) by A.F. Fraser, D.M. Broom, Donald M. Broom (Editor)  
 
 
 
 
Want to know more? We sell books on animal rights, animal welfare, nature and wildlife, factory farming, food politics, the meat industry, antibiotic resistant bacteria, ecological footprint, harmful myths; we offer cruelty free products, DVD's about animals, vegan food, vegan and vegetarian books, etc.

  Web www.animalfreedom.org/english/   
Support the site by surfing!
Prefer the book?