Non-valid arguments for taking animal rights too seriously |
||||||||
|
||||||||
This article is part of a series on falsities and demagogy. |
||||||||
Some arguments used in debate on the topics in the title simply are invalid. That goes for pro and contra. We selected a few of the most rigid arguments from different situations and placed an appropriate counterargument. Because a more clear and honest way of reasoning helps improve the circumstances animals live in. Mail us if you encounter other or new (counter)-arguments. Apart from the specific issues there are the types of arguments in general. Fallacies are deliberately or accidentally used in a debate. So be aware of the principles and the integrity of an opponent. Click here for tips on how to react to animal-unfriendly behavior of others. | ||||||||
Non-valid arguments (deceptive arguments) for different groups |